Recommendations, apply to, and you may candidate sex from inside the U

Recommendations, apply to, and you may candidate sex from inside the U

101 . Newhagen , John Elizabeth. , “Beyond care about-report: Using latency to respond to design issue responding process towards the web-founded public-opinion studies,” on Sourcebook to possess Political Telecommunications Look , eds. Bucy , Erik Corfu wife P. and you will Lance Holbert , Roentgen. ( Ny : Routledge , 2011 ).Google Pupil

102 . Oxley , Douglas R. , Smith , Kevin B. , Alford , John Roentgen. , Hibbing , Matthew V. , Miller , Jennifer L. , Scalora , Mario , Hatemi , Peter K. , and you will Hibbing , John R. , “Governmental attitudes are different that have mental attributes,” Research , 321 : 1667 – 1670 .CrossRefGoogle College student

103 . Swers , Michele L. , “Is feminine more likely to choose to possess women’s facts expense than simply their male associates?” Legislative Knowledge Every quarter 1998 , 23 : 435 – 448 .CrossRefGoogle Pupil

104 . Swers , Michele L. , The difference Female Generate: The policy Impact of women in the Congress ( Chicago : College of Chicago Drive , 2002 ).Yahoo Beginner

105 . Mountain , Kim Quaile and Hurley , Patricia An effective. , “Symbolic speeches on the U.S. Senate as well as their representational ramifications,” Log out of Government 2002 , 64 : 219 – 231 .CrossRefGoogle Student

108 . Mansbridge , Jane , “Is always to blacks depict blacks and feminine represent feminine? A contingent ‘yes’,” Record out-of Government 1999 , 61 ( 3 ): 627 – 657 .CrossRefGoogle College student

109 . Sanbonmatsu , Kira , “Gender-related political education and also the descriptive image of females,” Political Conclusion 2003 , twenty-five : 367 – 388 .CrossRefGoogle Beginner

110 . Dolan , Kathleen , “Will there be a great ‘gender affinity effect’ during the Western politics? S. Domestic elections,” Governmental Look Every quarter 2008 , 61 : 79 – 89 .CrossRefGoogle Scholar

This particular article might have been cited from the following the books. It record is created predicated on research available with Crossref.

Benstead, Lindsay J. Jamal, Amaney An effective. and you may Lust, Ellen 2015. Could it possibly be Gender, Religiosity or Each other? A role Congruity Concept of Applicant Electability in Transitional Tunisia. Viewpoints for the Politics, Vol. 13, Question. step 1, p. 74.

Bauer, Nichole Meters. 2015. Who stereotypes female people? Distinguishing individual differences in women stereotype reliance. Politics, Teams, and Identities, Vol. step 3, Question. step 1, p. 94.

Rosenthal , Cindy Simon , “The fresh new part out of gender in detailed icon,” Political Search Every quarter 1995 , forty-eight : 599 – 611

McLaughlin, Bryan Davis, Catasha Coppini, David Kim, More youthful Mie Knisely, Sandra and you may McLeod, Douglas 2015. When female attack. Government and Life Sciences, Vol. 34, Situation. step 1, p. forty-two.

Pyeatt, Nicholas L. and you can Yanus, Alixandra B. 2016. Sending blended signals: the newest part of gender and you will partisanship into the evaluations off political figures. Journal regarding Elections, Public opinion and you will Activities, Vol. twenty six, Material. 4, p. 423.

Koch, Thomas and you will Obermaier, Magdalena 2016. With Cardio and you may (No) Attention? Exactly how Recipients Adversely Infer Lost Information about People in politics and just how So it Impacts the fresh Assessment of the Speakermunication Look, Vol. 43, Situation. 7, p. 972.

Turska-Kawa, Agnieszka and you may Olszanecka-. Stereotypes Determining Attitudes out-of Female People in politics: The actual situation from Poland. Politics during the Main European countries, Vol. fourteen, Topic. step three, p. seven.

Schneider, Monica C. and you will Bos, Angela L. 2019. The usage Societal Character Idea into Examination of Gender for the Government. Political Psychology, Vol. forty, Issue. S1, p. 173.

Park, Sunrays Young and you may Baek, Younger Min 2019. Citizens’ Ambivalence into Feminine Politicians: Why Ambivalence Matters having Gender Equivalence during the good Democracy. Log of females, Government & Plan, Vol. forty, Matter. dos, p. 309.

Rusidze, Nino 2019. Stereotypes, Profile Assassination and you can Feamales in Politics. Corvinus Diary regarding Worldwide Issues, Vol. 4, Matter. 1, p. 15.

Aaldering, Loes and you may Van Der Pas, Daphne Joanna 2020. Political Management on the Mass media: Gender Bias inside Chief Stereotypes throughout the Promotion and Regime Times. British Record of Governmental Research, Vol. fifty, Procedure. step 3, p. 911.

Boer, Noortje 2020. How can People Evaluate Road?Height Bureaucrats’ Warmth and you can Competence? A great Typology and Try. Social Administration Opinion, Vol. 80, Material. 4, p. 532.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *